Comments on: DataMapper: A Better ORM for Ruby https://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/05/23/datamapper-a-better-orm-for-ruby/ Matt Wynne taking it one tea at a time Wed, 21 Aug 2019 13:05:19 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2 By: adam french https://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/05/23/datamapper-a-better-orm-for-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-119 Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:05:13 +0000 http://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/05/23/datamapper-a-better-orm-for-ruby/#comment-119 yup, you can persist to a bunch of other places outside of the usual RDBMs (sqlite, mysql, postgres).

One of the spiffiest one’s I’ve seen so far is Wycat’s IMAP adapter (http://github.com/wycats/dm-adapters/tree/master/imap), which would make calls direct to a mail server for persistence.

]]> By: Matt https://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/05/23/datamapper-a-better-orm-for-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-92 Fri, 23 May 2008 13:52:16 +0000 http://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/05/23/datamapper-a-better-orm-for-ruby/#comment-92 That’s really interesting. So you could still use it if you just wanted to persist to flat files, for example?

Sounds like I need to dig a bit deeper.

]]> By: Michael Klishin https://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/05/23/datamapper-a-better-orm-for-ruby/comment-page-1/#comment-91 Fri, 23 May 2008 12:05:51 +0000 http://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/05/23/datamapper-a-better-orm-for-ruby/#comment-91 DataMapper 0.9 also is not tied just to RDBMS, it is well abstracted persistence framework.

]]>