<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Total Programming&#8221; and the XP Team</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/11/08/total-programming-and-the-xp-team/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/11/08/total-programming-and-the-xp-team/</link>
	<description>Matt Wynne taking it one tea at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:31:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blog.mattwynne.net : If Code is Written Solo in a Forest, Does it Make a Sound?</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/11/08/total-programming-and-the-xp-team/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>blog.mattwynne.net : If Code is Written Solo in a Forest, Does it Make a Sound?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 21:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/11/08/total-programming-and-the-xp-team/#comment-482</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] written before about my views on the importance of pair programming as a way of building a common conciousness in [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written before about my views on the importance of pair programming as a way of building a common conciousness in [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/11/08/total-programming-and-the-xp-team/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/11/08/total-programming-and-the-xp-team/#comment-350</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely! The paper referenced at the top of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stuartwray.net/how-does-pair-programming-work-17-july-2008.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this blog post&lt;/a&gt; by Steve Freeman contains, amongst other interesting things, some discussion about cognitive science research suggesting that the &#039;chat&#039; during pair programming keeps all the parts of your brain engaged in solving the problem. Something that doesn&#039;t happen so easily if you&#039;re working alone, in silence.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely! The paper referenced at the top of <a href="http://www.stuartwray.net/how-does-pair-programming-work-17-july-2008.pdf" rel="nofollow">this blog post</a> by Steve Freeman contains, amongst other interesting things, some discussion about cognitive science research suggesting that the &#8216;chat&#8217; during pair programming keeps all the parts of your brain engaged in solving the problem. Something that doesn&#8217;t happen so easily if you&#8217;re working alone, in silence.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Alen</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/11/08/total-programming-and-the-xp-team/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Alen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattwynne.net/2008/11/08/total-programming-and-the-xp-team/#comment-349</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;We used to do pair programming quite a bit when I started working at Laszlo and there were just two of us on the core client-side team.  At first it was just an efficient way to learn.  Then after I came up to speed in the code base we would do it whenever things were tricky.  I don&#039;t hear people talk about it much, but I am quite fond of &#039;pair debugging&#039; which I&#039;ve found to be a very efficient way to isolate a bug when there is time pressure to fix it.  I believe there is something about the social interaction which opens up new pathways of thought.  There&#039;s a bunch of research in educational theory to support that about how we learn at a higher level when interacting with other people.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I also agree with your point about the value of shared consciousness, which we more commonly achieve through peer code reviews. It seems to me that good code is typically a result of it being well-loved.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We used to do pair programming quite a bit when I started working at Laszlo and there were just two of us on the core client-side team.  At first it was just an efficient way to learn.  Then after I came up to speed in the code base we would do it whenever things were tricky.  I don&#8217;t hear people talk about it much, but I am quite fond of &#8216;pair debugging&#8217; which I&#8217;ve found to be a very efficient way to isolate a bug when there is time pressure to fix it.  I believe there is something about the social interaction which opens up new pathways of thought.  There&#8217;s a bunch of research in educational theory to support that about how we learn at a higher level when interacting with other people.</p>

<p>I also agree with your point about the value of shared consciousness, which we more commonly achieve through peer code reviews. It seems to me that good code is typically a result of it being well-loved.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

