<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Acceptance Tests Trump Unit Tests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mattwynne.net/2009/01/17/acceptance-tests-trump-unit-tests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mattwynne.net/2009/01/17/acceptance-tests-trump-unit-tests/</link>
	<description>Matt Wynne taking it one tea at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 08:31:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Lucraft</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattwynne.net/2009/01/17/acceptance-tests-trump-unit-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Lucraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattwynne.net/2009/01/17/acceptance-tests-trump-unit-tests/#comment-362</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great post. I think you and I have been moving in the same direction on this. I&#039;d like to hear more thoughts when you have them.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I think you and I have been moving in the same direction on this. I&#8217;d like to hear more thoughts when you have them.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Oliver</title>
		<link>http://blog.mattwynne.net/2009/01/17/acceptance-tests-trump-unit-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mattwynne.net/2009/01/17/acceptance-tests-trump-unit-tests/#comment-359</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think that automated acceptance tests are the next logical step after test-infecting someone or a team. I think one reason it doesn&#039;t happen often enough is that teams lack the discipline to really think through a feature enough to write a test for it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that automated acceptance tests are the next logical step after test-infecting someone or a team. I think one reason it doesn&#8217;t happen often enough is that teams lack the discipline to really think through a feature enough to write a test for it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

